So You Are Thinking About Buying an E-Collar for Your Doberman
Your puppy, adolescent, or grown Doberman challenges you with barking, nipping, lunging on the leash, ignoring your recall, jumping the fence, or knocking over your children. Perhaps several of these sound familiar. You want something to change.
You may need to finish a work call without barking in the background. You may worry about another complaint from your landlord, dread walking past the neighbors, or fear that the next escaped chase will end on a road. Someone recommends an e-collar, and you begin to imagine what life might feel like if you could finally rely on your dog to respond.
Before you buy one, give that imagined improvement some attention. What would the collar make easier for you? Which part of the promise sounds most convincing? Put the relief you hope for alongside the questions about what using the collar would require from you and what your dog would experience.
At ADW, we oppose using electric shocks to train dogs, but we are not going to bother you with one-sided arguments. We take your need for a manageable life with your Doberman seriously. Understanding why an e-collar might appeal to you gives you a place to begin assessing whether a recommendation fits the situation you and your dog actually face.
In this article Jump to a section
What you need from a change in behavior
Let us look at a few examples to highlight the possible dynamics that guide decision-making. Suppose your Doberman barks when someone passes the window. A few barks during an otherwise quiet day may annoy you. Repeated barking through meetings may threaten your ability to work. A landlord's warning adds another consequence. To understand the decision you face, we need to consider the barking's frequency, cause, and place in your life.
Your interpretation matters too. “He barks when someone walks past” describes an event. “He thinks he runs this house” adds an explanation. If you accept that explanation, correcting his supposed challenge to your authority may begin to sound necessary. Ask what you have actually observed and what you have assumed about his intentions.
Or perhaps your adolescent Doberman pulls toward another dog while you hold a child's hand. You want physical control and enough predictability to get everyone home. If your puppy mouths your hands while you prepare dinner, you may chiefly want a few uninterrupted minutes. These circumstances can demand different responses, even when someone recommends the same device for both.
In a survey published in 2024, Arizona State University undergraduates who reported no formal training for their household dog gave reasons including insufficient time and expense.1 Some believed their dog needed no training. The researchers recruited undergraduates at one university, so these results do not establish how common those reasons are among Doberman guardians generally, but they give us a clue how practical constraints can enter decisions about seeking formal training.
You may already know that training takes practice. The difficulty may be finding room for it between shifts, homework, caring for someone, and your own need to rest. You may have followed conflicting training instructions and feel unwilling to begin another program whose full demands you cannot yet see.
When you want your Doberman’s behavior to change urgently, you may give yourself very little time to decide how to address it. Psychologists describe a need for cognitive closure: the desire to reach a definite answer, with an urgency to settle the question and a tendency to hold on to the answer once reached.2 In laboratory experiments, psychologists John Payne, James Bettman, and Eric Johnson found that participants facing short deadlines examined less information and made poorer choices between monetary gambles, according to the study’s measure of expected return.3 So how might this apply in your life?
Suppose a trainer with many followers and good reviews seems trustworthy to you and recommends an e-collar. You are searching between work and family demands and want the behavior resolved quickly. Buying the recommended collar may seem like a sensible next step. But if you use that recommendation to cut your search short, you could proceed without checking whether the method suits your dog’s situation or whether you can meet its training requirements.
Before buying an e-collar, compare what using it would require of you, its possible consequences for your dog, and the alternatives available for the behavior you want to change. Which parts of that comparison have you actually investigated, and which have you left unanswered because you want to decide quickly?
There is also a harder question here about the life you have arranged around your dog. Perhaps he lives with the family, while the family expects him to fit into a schedule and lifestyle that leaves little space for him. If that describes your situation, consider which expectations and routines you can change. Making room for him may mean accepting some behavior you find inconvenient and adjusting your day to accommodate his needs. You will also need to recognize the limits of what you can accommodate: even ordinary canine behavior can create danger or serious disruption. In those situations, you need a way to address the behavior. The need to act, however, does not establish that an e-collar is an appropriate response.
Why the promises can sound suited to your life
Two recurring promises deserve particular attention: dependable control at a distance and clearer communication.4,5 Dogtra promotes immediate recall and remote control with its 1900X4; SportDOG presents its TEACH approach as a route to clearer communication and consistent responses.5 These are claims from the companies selling the equipment. Whether they describe an advantage you need remains a separate question.
You could act when your dog is beyond your reach.
If you have watched your Doberman disappear after something, the prospect of acting when your dog is beyond your reach may carry enormous weight. You imagine being able to intervene instead of standing there calling to no avail. You may also imagine letting him enjoy more freedom without feeling frightened throughout a walk in an off-leash area.
An e-collar may appeal to you because it seems to provide a clear next step when calling your dog fails. If you have struggled to find an approach that feels workable, that apparent solution may also make further searching seem unnecessary. Psychologist Scott Plous explains Herbert Simon’s concept of satisficing: people often choose an option that meets their most important requirements without exhaustively comparing every alternative.6 For you, a remote might seem to meet an urgent requirement: having a way to intervene when your dog is beyond your reach. Once that requirement appears satisfied, how much more would you investigate before buying it?
The approaches you already know or have tried may not cover the options available for your dog’s situation. If you believe you have exhausted the alternatives, consider which methods you tried, how you applied them, and what led you to rule them out. What have you done to find approaches you have not yet encountered? A collar’s apparent simplicity and perceived control could give you a reason to stop looking before you have established whether it offers the most suitable response to the problem you face.
On a related note, psychologist Ellen Skinner distinguishes actual control from people's beliefs and experiences of control.7 You can apply that distinction by considering both what the device enables and what holding it might make you feel able to do. Feeling more able to intervene does not establish how reliably the device would help you interrupt the behavior.
Before you assume that a remote would give you better control, consider Lucy China and colleagues’ study of 63 dogs whose guardians reported problems such as chasing or poor recall.8 During training, dogs whose trainers emphasized rewards began returning sooner after a recall command and responded more often to the first command than dogs whose manufacturer-nominated trainers used e-collars. The groups also differed in trainers and training conditions, and the dogs spent most of their training time close to the trainer, usually on a long lead. Because different trainers worked under different conditions, we cannot tell how much of the difference in the dogs’ responses came from the training methods, the trainers’ skills, or the circumstances of the sessions. The findings give you a reason to question the collar’s assumed advantage for recall. They do not establish how reliably you could interrupt a chase far away, where you might most want that reassurance, something we will address in the upcoming e-collar series.
Your dog could finally understand what you want.
This promise may appeal if repeated requests have become frustrating or you worry that your dog finds you confusing. SportDOG's account includes teaching the behavior first, establishing an effective stimulation level, and using accurate timing and repetition.5 The promise is of a learned training process, with responsibilities for the person holding the remote.
Descriptions of low stimulation can also make the prospect feel easier to accept. E-Collar Technologies describes the Mini Educator as humane and claims that its proprietary stimulation avoids undue stress.9 If you worry about hurting your dog, that assurance addresses a concern you may need resolved before buying, but does it address your concerns about your Doberman’s welfare fully?
Psychologist Alexander Walker and colleagues found that people judged actions more favorably when researchers described them with more agreeable words.10 One example described someone working at a “meat processing plant” or a “slaughterhouse.” Across the descriptions they tested, the more agreeable wording increased acceptance. When researchers supplied details about what the actions involved, the wording had less influence, although its effect did not disappear. Consider, then, what a description draws your attention to and what it leaves out. Calling electrical stimulation “communication” tells you what the trainer intends to accomplish, but gives you little information about what your dog would feel. Ask the trainer to explain the sensation, how the dog learns to respond to it, and how they assess the dog’s experience. If a company promises to avoid “undue stress,” ask how it defines and tests that claim. Here, we are discussing a collar’s electrical function; a device may also provide separate tone or vibration options.4,9
In its own instructions, Dogtra describes a stage in which the dog learns to avoid stimulation by responding to commands.11 Learning through escape or avoidance belongs to the basic psychology of reinforcement.12 If avoiding the sensation helps motivate the response, its aversiveness matters to how that training works. Calling the signal communication leaves that question open. You can understand the intended message and still care about what makes the dog respond to it.
When you trust the person advising you
The people making the recommendation may seem particularly credible because they work with dogs you recognize. A police-dog background or a controlled off-leash demonstration may feel relevant when you share your home with a strong-bodied working breed. You may think: this person understands the dog I have.
Some sellers explicitly connect that professional identity with your daily pressures. On its Unleashed sales page, DIYK9 invokes police K9 experience while addressing limited time, worry about your bond, public embarrassment, and the wish to feel confident with your dog.13 The company appeals to several concerns you might bring to the decision.
Zimbardo and Gerrig describe informational and normative social influence.12 Informational influence occurs when you use other people’s judgments as evidence about what is correct, especially when you feel uncertain about your own judgment. Normative influence occurs when you go along with others to gain acceptance or avoid disapproval, even if you privately remain unconvinced. In considering an e-collar, you might trust experienced Doberman handlers to know which methods work. You might also hesitate to question their recommendation if doing so could invite ridicule or make you feel unwelcome. Both influences can operate together. Ask yourself what has persuaded you that the recommendation suits your situation and whether you would feel comfortable disagreeing with the people offering and supporting it.
A trainer’s concern for welfare does not tell you which methods they consider acceptable. In interviews with 35 trainers, Jamie DeLeeuw and Todd Williams found that both reward-focused trainers and trainers who combined rewards with aversive methods emphasized dogs’ emotional well-being.14 The researchers also found differences in what trainers considered acceptable: reward-focused trainers tended to reject deliberately causing fear or pain, while mixed-method trainers more often justified aversive methods when they believed the benefits outweighed the discomfort. A shared concern for welfare therefore did not lead these trainers to the same decisions about how to protect it. If a trainer recommends an e-collar and assures you that your dog’s welfare comes first, ask how they reached that recommendation. What benefits do they expect, what discomfort or risks do they consider acceptable, and what evidence supports that judgment for your dog? Caring about your dog and judging a method appropriately are both relevant to your trust in a trainer; concern alone cannot establish that the recommendation is sound.
Then there is what you see. If a trainer asks you to watch for a fast response, that is an obvious feature to notice. You may feel more confident as you watch the dog respond. Ask which observations support the full promise: speed, performance somewhere unfamiliar, the dog's behavior between commands, or what happens later in the process when the equipment is absent?
Expectations can influence skilled observers too. In a study of 18 detection-dog teams, Lisa Lit and colleagues told handlers that paper markers indicated where drugs or explosives were present, although none of the search areas contained those substances.15 Handlers reported more alerts at the marked locations than elsewhere within those search areas. Their reports followed the suggested locations despite the absence of the target scent. The researchers could not determine whether handlers misread their dogs’ behavior or prompted the dogs to alert. Experience had not prevented expectations from affecting the reported results.15 When an experienced trainer recommends an e-collar, this research gives you a reason to examine how they judge its success. If a trainer expects the collar to help, an impression that a dog looks more attentive could reflect both the dog’s behavior and the trainer’s expectations. If they describe a dog as more attentive or responsive, ask what specific changes they observed and how they checked that improvement. The study does not establish that your trainer has misjudged a dog; it shows why experience alone cannot settle whether an assessment is accurate.
If you feel more capable after receiving instruction, that can be a real benefit. You may give clearer cues, practice more consistently, or choose situations more carefully. Several things have then changed together. A better result would leave open how much each contributed, including the e-collar device itself.
However, if you expect an e-collar to make you feel confident about training your dog, that outcome is not universal. In a comparative training study, Jonathan Cooper and colleagues found that, after instruction, 16 of 21 guardians in the e-collar group felt confident about applying the method, compared with all 21 in the reward-focused group.16 The researchers did not establish why some guardians lacked confidence or how anyone’s confidence had changed. Instruction and access to the collar therefore did not guarantee the confidence you might hope to gain. Consider what would help you feel prepared: having a means of intervening, understanding your dog’s behavior, practicing a training method, or some combination of these. What would the instruction offered with your purchase actually help you achieve?
The work remains yours after the delivery arrives
Ordering the equipment can be straightforward. Learning to use it according to its proponents' own conditions demands more.
In a French survey published in 2018, 40% of the 330 e-collar users reported buying their collars online and 35% through pet or gardening shops.17 A majority, 71.8%, did not report professional advice from a veterinarian or trainer at purchase. The self-selected survey covered remote, bark-activated, and containment collars. Its separate figures do not establish that every online buyer lacked guidance, or whether an owner later obtained professional training. But, before you order, ask what guidance you would actually receive.
In their instructions, manufacturers describe considerably more than putting a collar on your dog and pressing a button whenever you dislike his behavior. Dogtra requires prior understanding of basic commands.11 E-Collar Technologies states that its collars do not replace foundation obedience training and tells users to learn a complete program and apply it consistently.18 Before you buy, consider what those requirements mean for the training you and your dog have actually completed. If you have tried teaching recall but have not followed through consistently, what establishes that your dog understands the command you now want the collar to reinforce? With a five- or six-month-old puppy, consider how much of his short time with you you have devoted to teaching and practicing that response before deciding you need a different method. Compare the learning you can identify with the manufacturer’s stated requirements. What training are you expecting the collar to build on, and what training do you expect it to replace or reduce?
Instruction is available, but varies. The Mini Educator's advertised package includes an owner's manual9, in which E-Collar Technologies also directs users to online videos.18 E-Collar Technologies and SportDOG provide public manuals, articles, or instructional videos without a course charge on the pages reviewed.19,20 Separately, DIYK9 advertised its recorded Unleashed course at $697 with 17 hours of footage when we checked on September 19, 2026.13 Purchasing a course or having access to recordings does not demonstrate that you can apply a suggested method accurately while managing your own dog.
The companies also state limits. Dogtra warns against using its products on aggressive dogs.11 E-Collar Technologies advises professional consultation for aggressive behavior and warns that dogs may associate stimulation with the handler or surroundings, with possible redirected or increased aggression.18 If lunging is the behavior you want to stop, the movement alone does not establish its cause. ASPCA guidance describes dogs who bark and lunge to keep other dogs away and dogs who do so because restraint frustrates their attempts to greet or play.21 Before treating lunging as aggression, or assuming it is harmless, consider the circumstances and the rest of your dog’s behavior. Your understanding of “aggression” may differ from how a qualified behavior professional assesses the behavior or how the manufacturer uses the term. Before deciding that a warning does not apply, check what the term covers and how someone has assessed your dog’s behavior. If a trainer calls it “reactivity” and recommends a collar “before it becomes aggression,” ask what supports that distinction in your dog’s case. The label alone does not establish that your dog falls outside the manufacturer’s warning.
Before treating an e-collar as a way to simplify your life, include the learning and practice that its advocates require in your estimate of the work. Also ask what help would be available when you encounter a situation the instructor has not covered in a video.
Why a benefit can make the remaining questions uncomfortable
Suppose you have found a trainer who seems to understand you and a method that promises the change you need. You begin to imagine safer walks or a quieter home. New questions about costs to your dog may now feel as though they threaten that prospect.
A favorable impression can make something seem both more useful and less risky. Melissa Finucane and colleagues studied this tendency, known as the affect heuristic: allowing an overall feeling about something to guide judgments about its benefits and risks.22 Participants first rated a technology’s benefits and risks based on what they already knew or believed about it. Researchers then gave them information describing greater benefits, without providing details about the risks. When participants rated both again, they tended to judge the technology as less risky, even though the information they had received concerned its benefits.
Time pressure may strengthen this tendency. In a separate experiment in the same paper, Finucane and colleagues found that participants under time pressure showed a stronger tendency to judge technologies they considered more beneficial as less risky.22 Kenny Skagerlund and colleagues later found that higher benefit ratings tended to accompany lower risk ratings across a range of activities, although the strength of that relationship differed between individuals.23
When you hear how an e-collar might make daily life easier, especially when there is urgency, that appealing prospect may also make its risks feel less concerning. Ask yourself what you have learned about those risks separately from what you have heard about the benefits.
Your feelings about e-collars also deserve scrutiny if you oppose them. Discomfort with the method does not establish that it cannot change behavior. You can acknowledge evidence that it changes behavior while still questioning its welfare costs, necessity, and suitability for your dog.
In a 2024 experiment, Anamarie Johnson and Clive Wynne found that e-collar training stopped dogs chasing a moving lure more successfully than the two food-based procedures they tested.24 All six dogs included in the e-collar analysis stopped chasing during training and refrained from chasing in the first three tests. Four chased again in the final test in a new arena. The researchers excluded two additional dogs from the e-collar group after they received more shocks than the approved limit.
Amalia Bastos and colleagues challenged the comparison because the food-based procedures did not teach an alternative action, such as returning to the handler, and questioned whether the welfare measurements adequately captured distress.25 Johnson and Wynne acknowledged that their food-based procedures could be improved, while defending rapid learning as an important goal because guardians may not complete lengthy training.26 They also argued that the subtle stress-related behaviors they observed were unlikely to indicate extreme distress.
That response leaves questions about how better-developed food-based training would compare and what less obvious welfare costs might remain. For your decision, the distinction matters: Johnson and Wynne’s 2024 experiment provides evidence that electrical stimulation can stop chasing under particular conditions.24 However, it does not establish that an e-collar is necessary for your dog or that the result justifies its welfare costs.
Lucy China and colleagues’ recall comparison, discussed earlier, addresses a different outcome: how promptly dogs responded to instructions during training.8 Rebecca Sargisson and Ian McLean objected that these results did not establish whether e-collars were unnecessary for preventing predatory behavior; they argued that the researchers had not tested the most effective e-collar approach for that purpose.27 Cooper and colleagues replied that they had tested the recall approach recommended by the e-collar industry, delivered by industry-nominated trainers, and found that reward-focused training performed better during those sessions.28 The disagreement concerns what the comparison can establish. China and colleagues’ comparison gives you evidence about improving responses to commands under the tested conditions, while leaving the prevention of dangerous chasing outside those sessions unresolved. When someone cites a study to support a recommendation, check whether the measured improvement matches what you need your dog to do.
A change in your dog’s behavior does not, by itself, tell you how he experiences the training. Jonathan Cooper and colleagues found that dogs in the e-collar group showed more tension and yawning than dogs receiving reward-focused training.16 Their measurements of salivary cortisol, a hormone involved in the stress response, showed no significant difference between the e-collar group and either comparison group; their urinary cortisol measurements also showed no significant differences between groups. Cooper’s team nevertheless interpreted the behavioral findings as evidence of welfare concerns. When you consider a claim that a collar “works,” ask what evidence addresses your dog’s experience as well as the change in behavior.
Even if you accept that an e-collar improves the behavior you want changed, several questions remain. For example, would another practicable approach achieve the outcome? Does the change last and transfer to the situations you face? What happens to your dog while he learns? What does your dog learn? The American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior recommends reward-based methods and opposes aversives, including electronic collars, on welfare and effectiveness grounds.29 That professional recommendation gives you a reason to investigate reward-based help for your situation. Assess specific claims about benefits and harms against what the cited studies actually tested and found.
Having reasons both for and against a choice can become uncomfortable when you have to decide. Frenk van Harreveld and colleagues found in three experiments that mixed evaluations generated greater discomfort when participants had to commit to a position.30 Merely holding mixed views without having to choose did not produce the same pattern. You might encounter that tension when an e-collar promises relief but leaves you concerned about your dog’s experience. If so, consider whether the wish to settle the decision is making an unresolved concern harder to keep in mind.
People differ in how uncomfortable they find these mixed views. Andrew Luttrell and colleagues found that people who were more accepting of contradiction showed a weaker link between having mixed views and feeling conflicted.31 Feeling torn does not establish that one of your concerns is mistaken. You can recognize a possible benefit and continue investigating a possible cost without forcing either out of consideration.
Before you decide what to buy
Choose one recent incident and write down what happened. Include what came before it, what your dog did, what you did, and what followed. Then answer these questions in your own words:
What exact behavior do you want changed, and when does it happen?
Does it create danger, threaten something essential such as housing, or mainly inconvenience you? Could age or context help explain it? More than one answer may apply.
What do you believe the behavior means, and what observations support that interpretation?
What do you expect the collar to change? What would your dog do instead?
What would count as “working,” for how long, and in which situations? What would tell you that the outcome was unacceptable despite fewer incidents?
What do you hope would become easier for you? What time, support, practice, or changes at home could also help meet that need?
Which questions about the cause, alternatives, your own preparation, and effects on your dog remain unanswered before you expose him to electrical stimulation?
You may discover that your problem needs assessment before you can sensibly compare training methods. If safety or housing is at stake, seek help with that immediate situation while you investigate. Writing down the circumstances gives you something concrete to discuss.
As you consider the answers, keep these possibilities available. They concern different outcomes; none describes what every collar will do to every dog.
An e-collar can “work” and remain unnecessary or harmful.
China and colleagues, using the same dog sample as Jonathan Cooper and colleagues, concluded that an e-collar was unnecessary for effective recall training.8 Cooper and colleagues found greater welfare concerns with e-collar training despite owners reporting improvement.16 A change in behavior leaves the comparison with alternatives and the welfare question to answer.
You can become more confident and still rely on a problematic tool.
Feeling capable matters to you. It does not measure the effects on your dog or establish that you needed that tool to gain confidence.
Your dog can respond faster and understand the command no better than before.
Zimbardo and Gerrig distinguish learning from performance: motivation can affect how well someone demonstrates what they already know.12 Dogtra tells users to teach commands before adding stimulation, then describes a phase in which the dog learns to avoid it.11 A faster response alone cannot tell you whether your dog understands the command better or has more reason to perform it.
You can love your dog and use a method that harms him.
Your intentions cannot establish his experience. Ana Catarina Vieira de Castro and colleagues observed more stress-related behavior, including lip licking and yawning, among dogs at schools that relied heavily on aversive methods than among dogs at reward-based schools.32 Guardians had chosen the schools; the researchers did not randomly assign them. This comparison of broader training methods cannot predict your dog’s outcome. It does give you reason to examine what your dog experiences during training, however well you intend it.
Electrical stimulation can produce reliable behavior in a tested setting and carry welfare or relationship risks.
The chasing experiment showed consistent suppression in the first three tests, followed by poorer performance in a new arena.24 E-Collar Technologies warns that dogs may associate stimulation with the handler, potentially leading to redirected or increased aggression.18 That possibility gives you a reason to examine effects on your interactions with your dog. The warning does not establish how often trust or the bond suffers.
A low setting can feel mild to you and still function because your dog wants to avoid it.
Zimbardo and Gerrig describe how escaping or avoiding an unpleasant stimulus can reinforce behavior.12 Dogtra explicitly describes avoidance as a phase of its program.11 How mild a setting feels to you does not establish how your dog experiences it.
Your dog can appear calmer and be more inhibited.
Less movement alone cannot establish relaxation. In the chasing experiment, the authors considered increased staring at the lure alongside inhibited chasing as potentially consistent with continued arousal or frustration.24
For now, finish these two sentences: “I want my Doberman to…” and “I hope that will make it easier for me to…”. Keep both answers in view when someone recommends a collar. They give you a way to ask whether the recommendation addresses your actual circumstances, and what you still need to know before accepting it.
References
Numbers follow first citation. Manufacturer and training-provider sources document their own claims, instructions, and available materials. Web offerings were checked on September 19, 2026.
1. Johnson, A. C., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2024). Training methods used by dog guardians in the United States: Prevalence, sources of information, and reasons for use. Animals, 14(9), Article 1310. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14091310
2. Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: “Seizing” and “freezing.” Psychological Review, 103(2), 263–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.263
3. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 534–552. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.534
4. Dogtra. (n.d.). 1900X 1-dog unit. Retrieved September 19, 2026, from https://dogtra.com/products/1900x-1-dog
5. The SportDOG Staff. (n.d.). TEACH: 5 proven principles for smarter, more effective e-collar dog training. SportDOG Brand. https://www.sportdog.com/hunting-training-tips/teach-principles
6. Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. McGraw-Hill.
7. Skinner, E. A. (1996). A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 549–570. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.549
8. China, L., Mills, D. S., & Cooper, J. J. (2020). Efficacy of dog training with and without remote electronic collars vs. a focus on positive reinforcement. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, Article 508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00508
9. E-Collar Technologies. (n.d.). ET-300 Mini Educator 1/2 mile remote e-collar. Retrieved September 19, 2026, from https://www.ecollar.com/product/et-300-mini-educator-e-collar-1-2-mile-remote-dog-trainer/
10. Walker, A. C., Turpin, M. H., Meyers, E. A., Stolz, J. A., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2021). Controlling the narrative: Euphemistic language affects judgments of actions while avoiding perceptions of dishonesty. Cognition, 211, Article 104633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104633
11. Dogtra. (2025). 1900X owner’s manual. https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0683/9703/9841/files/USA_1900X_6.pdf?v=1766784485
12. Zimbardo, P. G., & Gerrig, R. J. (1999). Psychologie [Psychology] (S. Hoppe-Graff & I. Engel, Eds.; J. Baur, F. Jacobi, & M. Reiss, Trans.; 7., neu übersetzte und bearbeitete Aufl.). Springer. (Original work published 1996)
13. DIYK9. (n.d.). Unleashed! 5 step e collar. Retrieved September 19, 2026, from https://www.diyk9.com/unleashed
14. DeLeeuw, J. L., & Williams, T. J. (2026). Professional dog trainers’ perspectives on training methods: Ethical and evidentiary insights. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 13, Article 1744448. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2026.1744448
15. Lit, L., Schweitzer, J. B., & Oberbauer, A. M. (2011). Handler beliefs affect scent detection dog outcomes. Animal Cognition, 14(3), 387–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-010-0373-2
16. Cooper, J. J., Cracknell, N., Hardiman, J., Wright, H., & Mills, D. (2014). The welfare consequences and efficacy of training pet dogs with remote electronic training collars in comparison to reward based training. PLOS ONE, 9(9), Article e102722. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102722
17. Masson, S., Nigron, I., & Gaultier, E. (2018). Questionnaire survey on the use of different e-collar types in France in everyday life with a view to providing recommendations for possible future regulations. Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 26, 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2018.05.004
18. E-Collar Technologies. (2026). 300/302 owner’s manual. https://www.ecollar.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/2026-06-15-ET-300-302-manual.pdf
19. E-Collar Technologies. (n.d.). Dog training resources. Retrieved September 19, 2026, from https://www.ecollar.com/dog-training-resources/
20. SportDOG Brand. (n.d.). Training guide. Retrieved September 19, 2026, from https://www.sportdog.com/training-guide
21. American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. (n.d.). Managing and training leash-reactive dogs. ASPCApro. https://www.aspcapro.org/resource/managing-and-training-leash-reactive-dogs
22. Finucane, M. L., Alhakami, A., Slovic, P., & Johnson, S. M. (2000). The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::aid-bdm333>3.0.co;2-s
23. Skagerlund, K., Forsblad, M., Slovic, P., & Västfjäll, D. (2020). The affect heuristic and risk perception – Stability across elicitation methods and individual cognitive abilities. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 970. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00970
24. Johnson, A. C., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2024). Comparison of the efficacy and welfare of different training methods in stopping chasing behavior in dogs. Animals, 14(18), Article 2632. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14182632
25. Bastos, A. P. M., Warren, E., & Krupenye, C. (2025). What evidence can validate a dog training method? Learning & Behavior, 53(3), 227–228. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-024-00658-9
26. Johnson, A. C., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2025). Chasing solutions: A response to Bastos et al. (2024). Learning & Behavior, 53(3), 229–231. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-025-00672-5
27. Sargisson, R. J., & McLean, I. G. (2021). Commentary: Efficacy of dog training with and without remote electronic collars vs. a focus on positive reinforcement. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8, Article 629746. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.629746
28. Cooper, J. J., Mills, D. S., & China, L. (2021). Response: Commentary: Remote electronic training aids; efficacy at deterring predatory behavior in dogs and implications for training and policy. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 8, Article 675005. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.675005
29. American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior. (2021). Position statement on humane dog training. https://avsab.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/AVSAB-Humane-Dog-Training-Position-Statement-2021.pdf
30. van Harreveld, F., Rutjens, B. T., Rotteveel, M., Nordgren, L. F., & van der Pligt, J. (2009). Ambivalence and decisional conflict as a cause of psychological discomfort: Feeling tense before jumping off the fence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 167–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.015
31. Luttrell, A., Petty, R. E., Chang, J.-H., & Togans, L. J. (2022). The role of dialecticism in objective and subjective attitudinal ambivalence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(3), 826–841. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12504
32. Vieira de Castro, A. C., Fuchs, D., Morello, G. M., Pastur, S., de Sousa, L., & Olsson, I. A. S. (2020). Does training method matter? Evidence for the negative impact of aversive-based methods on companion dog welfare. PLOS ONE, 15(12), Article e0225023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225023
Disclaimer
The information provided in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and is not intended as a substitute for advice from your veterinarian or other healthcare professional.
You should not use this information to diagnose or treat a health problem or disease or prescribe any medication or other treatment. Always consult with your veterinarian or other qualified healthcare provider before making any changes to your pet's healthcare regimen, especially if they have or suspect they may have a health problem.
The author and publisher of this article are not responsible for any adverse effects or consequences resulting from the use of any suggestions, products, or procedures mentioned in this article. The use of this information is at the reader's discretion and risk.
